Kiri ☂ (
taotrooper) wrote2007-09-25 04:04 pm
Entry tags:
About FPS
I've been talking with this with
yaired,
gingetsu and
hamsterfactor, and more recently with
river_nile about this subject. I saw something on fandomsecrets about it as well. So I might as well make a post about it.
Most girls and young women who are either Disney freaks or lived their childhood during the early 90s, including me, suffer from what I like to call FPS.
Stands for Fugly Prince Syndrome.
If you've watched Beauty and the Beast (Disney version), you might remember how the Beast was like. Mmmm Beast. He starts very rude and wild, but as the movie continues he turns into a gentleman and overall a nicer guy. I mean, Disney has the quality to push some buttons and awake the little furry in all of us (two words: Robin Hood), but you couldn't feel guilty for liking the Beast -either as just a character, or finding him actually attractive. Because even if he was scary and excessively hairy, he wasn't really ugly (at least from the fairytale point of view), and in objective comparison you'd rather marry him than Gaston. So lots of girls crushed on the Beast, and that's cool. He's manly yet cuddly. And ironically cute.
The thing was the ending. I mean, the obvious conclusion was him turning back, not only because of the original fairytale, but because at that time for a Disney film there had to be a happy ending. Probably lots of viewers wouldn't find a problem with a different outcome, supposing Beast could survive Gaston's stab, and Belle saying the magic words AFTER the rose withered completely. She wouldn't mind living with Beast all furry (the servants would mind, but duh) forever. And that's fucking romantic of her.
But the real issue wasn't the Beast to turn human again, no. The issue was that the prince form was, to put it in a polite way, not attractive. He looks like a boyband member on steroids, and doesn't even feel like the Beast when wearing the ball blue outfit. If I were Belle, I'd have a harder time to believe he's my beastie boy; a single glance on the eyes -cue West Wing portrait flashback- isn't really enough. C'mon, tell me something about me only Beast knows! Growl at me! Eat porridge with your bare hands! DO SOMETHING MORE! WTF did you turn into, Jesus?!
Thus, we'd much rather this lame guy to turn back into the beast, even if the movie's supposed message was not being this shallow about appearances. So, that's the irony of FPS: we'd do the Beast, as long as he doesn't turn into that.
(Funny enough, when my mom saw me covering my eyes during the transformation sequence, every freaking time I watched the movie, she was convinced I was strange. B-b-but it was painful to seeeeee!For some reason the worse part for me was the feet. I never quite explained it to her so she assumed I had a crush on the prince. THE OTHER WAY AROUND, MA. I never corrected her because I thought I was being unreasonable until I saw I wasn't alone on this.)
And another thing. This bloke's canon name was Adam. WTF. Shouldn't he have a more French-sounding name? It's not even original! "Prince Adam" makes me think of He-man, and my brain breaks and wonders if there are crossovers.Moral of the story: all princes called Adam are just unsexy.
Most girls and young women who are either Disney freaks or lived their childhood during the early 90s, including me, suffer from what I like to call FPS.
Stands for Fugly Prince Syndrome.
If you've watched Beauty and the Beast (Disney version), you might remember how the Beast was like. Mmmm Beast. He starts very rude and wild, but as the movie continues he turns into a gentleman and overall a nicer guy. I mean, Disney has the quality to push some buttons and awake the little furry in all of us (two words: Robin Hood), but you couldn't feel guilty for liking the Beast -either as just a character, or finding him actually attractive. Because even if he was scary and excessively hairy, he wasn't really ugly (at least from the fairytale point of view), and in objective comparison you'd rather marry him than Gaston. So lots of girls crushed on the Beast, and that's cool. He's manly yet cuddly. And ironically cute.
The thing was the ending. I mean, the obvious conclusion was him turning back, not only because of the original fairytale, but because at that time for a Disney film there had to be a happy ending. Probably lots of viewers wouldn't find a problem with a different outcome, supposing Beast could survive Gaston's stab, and Belle saying the magic words AFTER the rose withered completely. She wouldn't mind living with Beast all furry (the servants would mind, but duh) forever. And that's fucking romantic of her.
But the real issue wasn't the Beast to turn human again, no. The issue was that the prince form was, to put it in a polite way, not attractive. He looks like a boyband member on steroids, and doesn't even feel like the Beast when wearing the ball blue outfit. If I were Belle, I'd have a harder time to believe he's my beastie boy; a single glance on the eyes -cue West Wing portrait flashback- isn't really enough. C'mon, tell me something about me only Beast knows! Growl at me! Eat porridge with your bare hands! DO SOMETHING MORE! WTF did you turn into, Jesus?!
Thus, we'd much rather this lame guy to turn back into the beast, even if the movie's supposed message was not being this shallow about appearances. So, that's the irony of FPS: we'd do the Beast, as long as he doesn't turn into that.
(Funny enough, when my mom saw me covering my eyes during the transformation sequence, every freaking time I watched the movie, she was convinced I was strange. B-b-but it was painful to seeeeee!
And another thing. This bloke's canon name was Adam. WTF. Shouldn't he have a more French-sounding name? It's not even original! "Prince Adam" makes me think of He-man, and my brain breaks and wonders if there are crossovers.

no subject
You and everyone else, indeed.
(the time I'm worrying is when watching LotR awakes the little furry inside - let's not even mention some Ghibli movies).
no subject
You just reminded me I still haven't watched Porco Rosso. And what on LotR is furry-awakening? The orcs? The hobbits' hairy soles?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'll allow myself to meddle here because I was going to comment about Ghibli. So, IAWTC.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Those wolves were way too sexy ^^ Not to mention Haku in dragon form. Not to mention Sherlock Holmes!!
no subject
I remember that one vividly and v. fondly because we watched the movie right after Grave of the Fireflies to shake out the depression. o.oU
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I knooow. And anyway, is his name ever mentioned in the actual movie? Or is it a sequels/merchandising thing?
Anyway, yes, Beast > Prince. The other Disney princes look generic. This guy looked like an orange-haired Ricky Martin.
no subject
orange-haired Ricky Martin
XDDDD Particularly 80's!Martin with his long hair, I can see the resemblance.
no subject
Robin Hood is also a bit of alright! ^___~
no subject
although in my case, I'd annoy them further by showing off because I knew the original song lyrics in English and they didn't *was a prissy purist from childhood*no subject
no subject
I love this post.
By the way, about the name, I remember from the DVD commentary that by the time they recorded the part where Gaston is hunting Beast through the castle roof and Belle was supposed to scream Beast's name, they realized they didn't have an actual name for him. I don't remember why they still kept him nameless until the Encyclopedia came out (it's been a while since I watched it), but I think it was the time.
As for why Adam my guess is that they were aiming at symbolic, since Adam was the first man and Beast what actually a man and stuff. :P They'd be my poster child for 'Why You Shouldn't Aim At Symbolic Unless You Really, Really Know What You're Doing' if Dan Brow wasn't around. :P
Re: I love this post.
That's an interesting theory, but I reckon Disney lacks the pseudo-intellectualism for symbolic meta. Probably someone from the staff was called Adam, or the director's son was an Adam, or some shit like that.
Or they were He-man fanboys and were watching re-runs at the time.Re: I love this post.
YYYYY XD TTLY.
But still, you spend all the time understanding the beauty inside and then, boom, it turns out he's also pretty outside. =D At least here, unlike in certain soap operas with a protagonist named Betty, there was no other way to break the curse. (I'm thinking in terms of the broken Aesop, btw.)
I reckon Disney lacks the pseudo-intellectualism for symbolic meta.
I wouldn't be so sure. After all, they take the true symbolism out of the fairy tales in a way it no longer can be a coincidence. >.>;;
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But lol that DA drawing is HILARIOUS.
no subject
no subject
Also, ROBIN HOOD OMG ♥ (and damnit, Ghibli's Sherlock Holmes! *shakes fist*)
no subject
I don't get why the foxy one is one of the sexiest Robin Hoods ever for me, right with the Men in Tights one. LOL Cary Elwes.
no subject
Everyone knows Disney created furries. (Because Robin Hood? Hot, even if it pains me to say too).
Yeeeees, the Prince is ugly. What bothers me the most is that they are able to create good looking men (my first fictional crush was Prince Phillip, SHUT UP! I still go all starry eyed when I watch Sleeping Beauty). And I definitely had a crush on both Aladdin and Eric. XP
But it was really nice to discover we're not alone. XDDDDD
no subject
While not every girl who liked Disney Robin became a furry, I have the suspicion most girls who became furries MUST have the hots for Robin even in some degree.
no subject
no subject
no subject
By the way, I started watching Odin Sphere. I just finished the video of Gwendolyn~.
no subject
(And I liked Oswald a lot, b-but Cornelius is cute even if he doesn't appear much. XD;)
no subject
And then you'll check the Okami ones? *puppy eyes*no subject
Have you wondered why every single BaTB merchandise has the Beast as the Beast rather than the human form? SAME REASON.
no subject
Interestingly enough, the Ken doll was still less uglier than the actual character in-movie.
no subject
To me Beast looks a lot like... Michael Bolton or something... ._. Or, if I remembered correctly, Envy's real face which also reminded me of Michael Bolton... therefore Beast is actually a distant relative to Ed and Al....... *is shot*
Well, that makes little sense *goes back to pretending Beast's name is not Adam, and he didn't change back into a human*
no subject
I boggled for some seconds with the Envy thing because
my brain blockedI had forgotten most of the anime-only plots of FMA. Too many months of manga and all.Denial is a wonderful thing.
no subject
AHAAHAHAHAHAA! Ah, that's awesome.
Disney has never had attractive animated men for some reason. The only American (sorta) company that got it right was Fox/Don Bluth when they made Dimitre in Anastasia. (John Cusack for the win!)
And yeah, the Beast in human form might as well be a completely different person. Disney really did nothing in that movie to show that yes, this was the same guy. Any older properties Disney never made any kind of effort to show why the girls might have even given two shits about half of these princes.
And..... I have the entire movie of Robin Hood memorized from my VHS tape of it off the Disney Sunday Movie in 1984. "Ah! But remember, 'faint hearts never won fair lady...' Fear not my friends! This shall be my greatest performance!"
Disney's only convincing romances happened to furries.
no subject
Disney really did nothing in that movie to show that yes, this was the same guy.
Yeah, it was confusing for me as a kid. What, she recognized his eyes or his glance? That's it? I mean, it's fucking magic! It's a castle with dancing and singing cutlery! Why is she so sure it's not a spell over some other guy confusing her senses, and the real beast isn't dead on the floor? Fuck, Belle, you're the smart Disney princess, the one with the overgrown imagination who reads fiction!
no subject