Kiri ☂ (
taotrooper) wrote2010-06-22 03:13 am
Entry tags:
More in the "not sure if want" tag...
So I just heard today that Rick Riordan is writing a sequel series for Percy Jackson, called Heroes of Olympus. Not the one with Egyptian setting, but another one in LOLGREEK that actually takes off from the open oracular cliffhanger by the end of the book.
So in my search I'm first directed to the Amazon page (ah, it's about a new trio of demigods :oo ), then the cover (OMG MECHA DRAG-- wait, which one is Jason and which one is Leo? No wait, what do you mean 'familiar demigods'? Oh brother). Finally, a link from the author's blog to the first two chapters (*reads blog post* ...seriously? bummer!)
SO, IT'S PRETTY MUCH APOLLO JUSTICE BUT WITH SHOUNENTARDS INSTEAD OF LAWYERS*.
No, think about it. Set in the same universe and premise. Sequel. The main character isn't the title guy from the first series, yet the plot still revolves more about him than our new lead. I'm sure Percy will steal Jason's spotlight harder than Phoenix as soon as he appears (or even before; hell, even Annabeth popping in for two pages and not doing anything stole the show.) Especially since Jason is SO BORING, YOU GUYS.
I mean yes, he has amnesia, but that doesn't excuse how dull he was (if anything, it makes him duller). I'd much rather have Piper or Leo as the main lead. I'm at a lost about who could be Piper's mom (as I guess her dad is the mortal one), but so far she seems badass and I like her. Leo is the one showing more personality of the trio and I'm really liking him the best. Plus now I bet Jason is the remaining blond kid in the cover, and that annoys me so much and makes me crave more for the other two to be the real protagonist, since Piper is half Cherokee and Leo half Latino and you're ruining the chance to have a non-white-boy lead nnnnng raaaaaah.
But back to Leo because I have to add something. The Amazon summary mentions that his cabin has a lot of tools and he could build shit, and I was all "dude, wouldn't it be cool if he was a son of Hephaestus?!" PJO wasn't kind to him, so that's a nice change of focus. But now after reading the chapters and knowing him, naaaah fat chance, I was all "LMAO ttly Hermes' kid like whoa". I'll eat a hat with wings if he's not Cabin Eleven. From the physical description to the personality. And I actually love the idea of having a son of Hermes who a) doesn't have such a complicated fate of doom (I-I guess?), and b) isn't a Weasley twins ripoff. Plus, after the shit ton of development Hermes got in PJO5, it would be bittersweet to see if they can retake where he stands now with another child of his, after that talk with Percy. Seriously, why isn't Leo the lead? Most personality from the three, a strong sense of humor, is a POC, might have a deity parent the old readers are familiar (Jason is probably Zeus', how meh), and so on.
So, um. I have no idea. I'll still read it because I enjoyed the original series so much, but I don't think I could like it better than the Percy story. But like I was telling
fujurpreux on Twitter, I would've preferred a sequel that took place one or more generations later, that we wouldn't have them dealing with this prophecy and let seven new kids shine alone. But now I bet this is going to be four old characters (I'm betting Percy, Annabeth, and either Clarisse, Nico or Thalia) + these three new ones. That's just tacky.
On the other hand, I was curious about post-canon Rachael!
*And mind you, I fucking love Apollo Justice. Then again, Apollo was likable and Jason is a walking cliché of dullness.
So in my search I'm first directed to the Amazon page (ah, it's about a new trio of demigods :oo ), then the cover (OMG MECHA DRAG-- wait, which one is Jason and which one is Leo? No wait, what do you mean 'familiar demigods'? Oh brother). Finally, a link from the author's blog to the first two chapters (*reads blog post* ...seriously? bummer!)
SO, IT'S PRETTY MUCH APOLLO JUSTICE BUT WITH SHOUNENTARDS INSTEAD OF LAWYERS*.
No, think about it. Set in the same universe and premise. Sequel. The main character isn't the title guy from the first series, yet the plot still revolves more about him than our new lead. I'm sure Percy will steal Jason's spotlight harder than Phoenix as soon as he appears (or even before; hell, even Annabeth popping in for two pages and not doing anything stole the show.) Especially since Jason is SO BORING, YOU GUYS.
I mean yes, he has amnesia, but that doesn't excuse how dull he was (if anything, it makes him duller). I'd much rather have Piper or Leo as the main lead. I'm at a lost about who could be Piper's mom (as I guess her dad is the mortal one), but so far she seems badass and I like her. Leo is the one showing more personality of the trio and I'm really liking him the best. Plus now I bet Jason is the remaining blond kid in the cover, and that annoys me so much and makes me crave more for the other two to be the real protagonist, since Piper is half Cherokee and Leo half Latino and you're ruining the chance to have a non-white-boy lead nnnnng raaaaaah.
But back to Leo because I have to add something. The Amazon summary mentions that his cabin has a lot of tools and he could build shit, and I was all "dude, wouldn't it be cool if he was a son of Hephaestus?!" PJO wasn't kind to him, so that's a nice change of focus. But now after reading the chapters and knowing him, naaaah fat chance, I was all "LMAO ttly Hermes' kid like whoa". I'll eat a hat with wings if he's not Cabin Eleven. From the physical description to the personality. And I actually love the idea of having a son of Hermes who a) doesn't have such a complicated fate of doom (I-I guess?), and b) isn't a Weasley twins ripoff. Plus, after the shit ton of development Hermes got in PJO5, it would be bittersweet to see if they can retake where he stands now with another child of his, after that talk with Percy. Seriously, why isn't Leo the lead? Most personality from the three, a strong sense of humor, is a POC, might have a deity parent the old readers are familiar (Jason is probably Zeus', how meh), and so on.
So, um. I have no idea. I'll still read it because I enjoyed the original series so much, but I don't think I could like it better than the Percy story. But like I was telling
On the other hand, I was curious about post-canon Rachael!
*And mind you, I fucking love Apollo Justice. Then again, Apollo was likable and Jason is a walking cliché of dullness.

no subject
no subject
The girl at least could have potential to kick ass although it's too early to tell in personality and she's not as great as Annabeth yet. I just hope she's not just there for love interest, bleh.
no subject
Also, one thing I really appreciated was that, while Percy still had the whole "destined and superpowerful" thing going, it didn't do him much good a lot of the timne without experience, and training and experience frequently paid off, and he regularly had to be rescued by people who knew what they were doing. It doesn't sound like this is maintaining that tradition.
no subject
I don't know. I'm not too critical of this series as it hits many of my buttons, but it worries me more how this Jason kid seems so bleh when Riordan has written well-thought characters beyond cliches before. I hope this will change later, or this will affect the book(s) a lot.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Potter is a case where he's still helped and saved all the time by everything and everyone ever. But unlike Percy, he never truly does anything on his own (he moves with the plot) but is still fixed in the Hero Role. Jackson takes it with humor, is aware of almost all his flaws, appreciates more the help he gets, and isn't the absolute hero. So, it's easier to like him better. Plus, the action pacing is better in PJO than HP.
no subject
But my coworkers are pretty much all in general agreement that PJO is better because, well, it is.
(Also, I have such severe issues with how "Muggle" is essentially a derogatory racial term that's supposed to be cute and ironic.)
no subject
I did like the first five books at the time, regardless of his lameness as a hero. But I really find PJO far superior and not only because of my fondness for mythology butchery makes me forgiving. Which is why I really hope this Jason kid gets better when he gets his memories back, since the author was really decent at writing main and secondary characters and more consistent than Rowling. It's sad that he's milking the cash cow.
no subject
I get why kids, and people who started reading it at 10-14 like it, but how adults who first encountered it as adults can like it is beyond me. (For that matter, I wonder how people with options survive the tedium of the first book until Hagrid shows up. Hagrid and Professor McGonegal-I know I misspelled that-are the only characters I really like as of mid-book 3. I also like Hermione a lot, but I suspect that's mostly for charactertype. The Weasley's are fun individually and together,but don't grab me. Everyone else I either forget unless they show up, or am annoyed by, except for enjoying Snape and Draco's irrational hatred of Harry.)
no subject
Then again, most of my fun was to pretend that the Potters descended somehow from Clow Reed, a la Watanuki (obsessed with Cardcaptor Sakura at the time). McGonagall and Hagrid don't get enough spotlight later on, though. More adults start to show up later or get a bit deeper, but I really don't know if you'll grow fond of any.
no subject
Agreed \o/
no subject
And I loved how Percy told Hermes that Annabeth DID ---- ----. Just not in the way he hoped.
no subject
Percy telling things to Hermes in the last book was so awesome. I loved those parts.
no subject
Which is why this Leo kid should be his son to continue this subplot, really.no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
tuve un BSODvi varias cosas :D Aquí, si quieres ver: http://alcesverdes.dreamwidth.org/57201.htmlno subject
I would've loved if Chiron's words had held truth and the new prophecy hadn't happened during Percy's life. :|
no subject
Hell, even a timeskip of ten years would've been decent, with them being the mentors or whatever. But apparently, the most time that happened between this and the last book is 1-2 years. And considering the "lost hero" is Percy, that means HE'S STILL THE ONE IN THE FUCKING TITLE. This is not nextgen, it's the same fucking story but pretending it's not by following the new part of the cast.
no subject
I'll still read them, 'tho :/ At least the first one.
Edited for appropiate icon
I-I know I'll still read them and stick around by principle. Even if it's just to check out if my theories are right. And because I'm weak and WHY THE HELL ARE CELESTIAL GODS HAVING BA-- wait, wrong WTF sequel to dread. Nevermind!
no subject
LOL Kiri socute *climbs on*
Re: Edited for appropiate icon
no subject
no subject
I hope we'll see some of the children of minor gods and goddesses, that would be fun.
no subject